Cyberhinge® IRP/DR Scoring Model: IBM® QRadar®
(scoring model by Cyberhinge, users are responsible for their own assessment)
(Score your QRadar Implementation below)
Log Source Coverage
Parsing & Normalization Quality
Use Case & Rule Maturity
Search & Investigation
SOAR & Automation
Analyst Workflow & SOC Maturity
IBM QRadar Score
Total Score: 0 / 71
QRadar Tier: N/A
| Domain | Score | Max |
|---|---|---|
| Log Coverage | 0 | 18 |
| Parsing & Normalization | 0 | 13 |
| Use Case Maturity | 0 | 14 |
| Search & Investigation | 0 | 8 |
| SOAR & Automation | 0 | 8 |
| SOC Maturity | 0 | 10 |
QRadar Tier Definitions
| Tier | Score Range | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced QRadar Deployment | 60–71 | Strong log coverage, tuned rules, automation, mature SOC workflows. |
| Comprehensive QRadar Deployment | 45–59 | Good coverage and tuning; some gaps in automation or SOC maturity. |
| Basic QRadar Deployment | 30–44 | Foundational SIEM usage; limited tuning or automation. |
| Below Recommended QRadar Deployment | 0–29 | QRadar installed but under‑utilized; weak tuning and poor coverage. |